
Well there was no denying that the BlackBerry TK Victory wasn’t a big hit. After the coverage on CrackBerry.com it went on to be covered by the multitudes of BlackBerry fan blogs and tech sites alikes globally.
The concept design was designed as being a mobile I wanted to see produced from RIM today. I love this company, not obsessed per say, but love for the innovation that RIM has brought over the years. The TK Victory concept was introduced not to compete against the many other renderings, concept designs or go as far as to show RIM up thinking I could do better.
“Innovation is a new way of doing things that result in positive change”
In the next 3 days in Orlando, Florida RIM will play host to its annual BlackBerry World and BlackBerry Jam and this year, Al Sacco (@ASacco) CIO.comwill be hosting the Q&A on “Ask RIM” Anything! Woot! (
Help Create a BlackBerry World ’12 Session—and Ask RIM Anything You Want http://bit.ly/IQUoQP
So my question to RIM…I Ask RIM
There are many talented conceptual designers designing from the end-user perspective (like myself) and there is no doubt that concept designs like the BlackBerry Blade http://bit.ly/GJNuv8 and the BlackBerry TK Victory (*DHB* http://bit.ly/HJnxJa) (*CrackBerry) http://bit.ly/IKHL5D have been favoured by not only the CrackBerry Nation, but to BlackBerry fans worldwide.
The Question: Do conceptual renderings from the community that have garnered such mass attention and appeal have any affect and/or influence whatsoever with RIM, RIM’s hardware design team, and RIM’s Executive team?






